The Supreme Court of India affirms Sanatana Dharma as a profound way of life, not bound by temple visits or rituals. “People will light a lamp inside their hut. That is all,” remarked CJI Surya Kant, capturing its simple, inclusive essence.
A nine-judge bench, probing religious freedoms under Article 25, heard arguments on temple entry and customs like Sabarimala. Justice Nagarathna emphasized: even without puja rooms or pilgrimages, one’s psyche remains Hindu. Professor G Mohan Gopal urged redefining Hinduism beyond rigid Vedic authority, embracing personal faith or autotheism for 80% of Indians.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta stressed judicial restraint in faith matters, leaving them to legislatures. Justices countered concerns of majoritarianism overriding constitutionalism, affirming equal rights for all under Article 25, majority or minority.
This observation honors Hinduism’s boundless spirit, from grand temples to humble homes. It protects devotees’ autonomy while guarding against imposed dogma.
Sanatana Dharma thrives in every heart’s quiet light. Follow Dharmic News for updates on this landmark discourse.
